Lysistrata: A Comedy of Stereotypes Essays -- essays research papers

LYSISTRATA, a satire of generalizations      The writer Aristophanes expounded on an antiquated Greece, Athens specifically, during a period of consistent fighting. His play â€Å"Lysistrata† is an endeavor to divert while putting over an enemy of war message. Actually even the naming of the play is an enemy of war message of sorts. The word â€Å"lysistrata† implies, â€Å"disband the army† (Jacobus 162). Aristophanes was a shrewd essayist; he makes a masterpiece that makes his crowd consider the present status of issues in their city. He calls attention to that there is a significant danger to Athens when all the great, youthful contenders are sent off to war. Aristophanes acheives this point by utilizing cliché portrayals of ladies to show how totally helpless Athens is without their youngsters at home. His message is somewhat subconscious in nature yet at the same time an exciting one. Aristophanes understood that crowds don’t come to plays to be lectured at however to be engaged. To this end, he utilizes satire and funny portrayals to please the observers/perusers. The chief type of humorous portrayal he relied upon was generalizing. As the principle subject of the play, the female generalization of woman’s just force base being sex was emphatically utilized. The primary character Lysistrata and all the ladies in Greece gather as one to basically assume control over the city states to end the Peloponnesian war. They do this by misusing their cliché power source, sexuality. This â€Å"power source† would...

Osteopathy free essay sample

More than forty-five percent of all osteopathic doctors are general specialists or family specialists. Likewise with clinical specialists, osteopaths have office practices and work in emergency clinics. Around fifteen percent of all osteopathic doctors are pros in such fields as medical procedure, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, psychiatry, nervous system science, and inward medication. Few osteopathic doctors have salaried situations in osteopathic emergency clinics and universities, private industry, and government organizations. So as to be an osteopath you are required to experience broad preparing. Osteopathic clinical training requires 4 years of fulltime, far reaching, and complete clinical instruction. When graduated and having accomplished the D. O. qualification (Doctor of Osteopathy) preceding being qualified to rehearse, the osteopathic doctor must finish a further 2 to 5 years of fulltime residency preparing in the claim to fame based on their personal preference, for example, inward medication and subspecialties, medical procedure and subspecialties, orthopedics, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, crisis medication, psychiatry, dermatology, pathology, family medication, or musculoskeletal medication (manual treatment osteopathy). We will compose a custom paper test on Osteopathy or on the other hand any comparative theme explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page There are 18 ensuring sheets with 85 claims to fame and subspecialties. Endless supply of residency preparing, claim to fame affirmation assessments are required. Much after the necessary instruction and preparing osteopaths despite everything go to training courses with the goal that they can be refreshed on the entirety of the present procedures that could be utilized for various circumstances. Osteopaths are required sure abilities that will empower them to carry out their responsibility proficiently and amazingly. Osteopaths right off the bat need to have an extraordinary nowledge of the human life systems, with the goal that they realize where everything ought to be and how one illness could likewise be influencing another piece of the body. Listening aptitudes are significant while seeking after a vocation as osteopaths. This will be utilized to decide or analyze what is causing the sickness or infection and would likewise manage them in utilizing the best possible treatment. P owerful relational abilities are fundamental to interface appropriately with patients. Osteopaths need to disclose things unmistakably to patients all the more particularly theâ treatment systems that will be utilized. They should realize how to make the patient agreeable since they would utilize feeling of touch to analyze and treat medical issues. This is the explanation they have to likewise have phenomenal eye-hand coordination. They should be delicate and quiet. It will be useful on the off chance that they appreciate thinking about others. They should be quick to subtleties particularly while inspecting the patient’s clinical history. An osteopath will commonly rehearse their aptitudes in a center in the start of their vocation all together sharpen their abilities while being regulated by an accomplished osteopath. This is just discretionary, yet it is extremely useful for their profession. An osteopath has numerous obligations and duties that they need to do during their day. Their obligations incorporate sorting out and keep their customers individual data. You should have the option to analyze and treat the affliction or ailment that is influencing their customer by depending on clinical just as careful modalities. Osteopaths will address issue and pains of bones, muscles, nerves, and other body frameworks by restorative and surgeries and, when considered gainful, manipulative treatment. Osteopaths will utilize demonstrative pictures, drugs, and different guides to analyze and treat real weaknesses. A few osteopaths will rehearse clinical or careful strength. Since most osteopaths work secretly their week after week hours will contrast from others, however normally they work 40 to 50 hours per week. An osteopath doesn't have a great deal of worry in their workplace. This is on the grounds that they are for the most part their own supervisors just as in charge of their work hours and don't have any cutoff times. An osteopath’s compensation and wages rely upon their experience, expertise, also s the measure of hours they work seven days. The common osteopath makes 90-140 dollars 60 minutes. Since osteopaths can work in various situations, for example, government organizations, private practices and even from home; their hours will change in an unexpected way. On normal an osteopath will make $160,000 every year. Despite the fact that this can run from 90-170,000 dollars. In the wake of being an osteopath for a specific measure of years you could turn into an osteopath college instructor. I picked osteopathy as my calling since the profession my mother has picked. I needed to do this since I never truly saw how osteopathy functioned or the entirety of the stuff that she does. In the wake of examining this calling I am exceptionally intrigued by it on account of the adaptable calendar and the great compensation. I believe that the sort of individual that would be keen on this activity would be a decent individual that appreciates helping individuals just as to show restraint so as to endure patients that are hard to manage. This individual would need to be body savvy just as individuals keen. On account of vocation considers I have discovered that this sort of employment is most likely not the best for me. I don't have the persistence to manage this activity, as I am a practitioner as per profession contemplates. In my sorts of knowledge sheet it says that I am not body shrewd and realizing the body is the most significant part of being an osteopath. Likewise, for my vocation proposal sheet it recommends that I do tasks that are outside and not employments that have me inside for the whole day. Subsequent to taking vocation considers I have secured that the positions that were proposed for me to take were occupations that I had as of now that of doing, for example, fireman, cop and animal handler.

Situation Analysis of Mondelez International †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Talk about the Situation Analysis of Mondelez International. Answer: Presentation: The task is an investigation of the present circumstance of an organization which can help in making proposals about the companys future. The organization considered is Mondelez Internatioanl Australia and New Zealand. The task is separated into two primary issues, the outside examination and inside investigation. The report responds to the inquiry with respect to the business condition and serious investigation of Mondelez. The extent of the task ranges over the news paper articles, diaries and magazines to draw the fundamental issue. The outside examination segment is isolated into segments, the first is the large scale condition patterns while the second is a serious investigation. The inside segment dives into the parts of Mondelez like money related qualities, human asset the board, etc. The last area is the end alongside the proposals for Mondelez. Mondelez International Australia and New Zealand is the Australian arm of Mondelez International and is perhaps the biggest producer and advertisers of food in Australia. The organization has its base camp in Melbourne and claims Vegemite and Cadbury. The organization earned net income of $26 billion out of 2016 (mondelezinternational.com, 2017). The yearly report shows that Mondelez International has expanding pace of aggregate return in five years contrasted with its rivals as appeared in the diagram beneath. Circumstance Analysis: The circumstance examination of Mondelez International Australia and New Zealand is has two sections, the macroeconomic and the SWOT investigation. The reason for the outer market is to look at the outside full scale condition factors which decide the systems of the global organization. The motivation behind the SWOT examination is to consider the qualities, weakneeses, openings and dangers to the organization being referred to. Mondelez Internatioanl works in an assortment of outer macroeconomic situations which summed up as PESTLE underneath. These variables decide the upper hand of Mondelez International in regard to its rivals (Hautz, Mayer Stadler, 2014). The political elements allude to governments arrangements, laws, worldwide concurrences with nations, etc which assume critical job in the organization approaches and methodologies. Australia is a protected government where the administration controls and make exchange hindrances to advance household organizations. Be that as it may, the legislature has step by step began support section of global organizations like Mondelez. Mondelez ought to likewise comply with the free market and lower tariif approaches and increase by it (aph.gov.au, 2017). Monetary elements comprise of those variables which impact the financing and valuing choices of the organizations like Mondelez. These components are swapping scale, work rates, estimation of land, flexibly chain the board, etc. The worldwide money rates have solid bearing on the evaluating procedures of the organizations. The estimation of Australian Dollar has fallen which implies that fares have gotten less expensive and the outsiders clients can purchase more with their monetary standards. The specialists state that the Australian producers like Mondelez can trade their merchandise more to gains exceptional yield (Beattie, 2017). Mondelez International ought to obtain assets economically and keep the evaluating methodology low to pick up from sending out its items to the remote markets (Brandenburg et al., 2014). The social perspectives manage the impact of an item on the general public and culture of a market like Australia. Mondelez International fabricates chocolate items with high calories which regularly face reactions from different layers of the general public. The Australians chocolate showcase is developing and Mondelez ought to underwrite the chance. The Australian culture cherishes premium chocolate and is prepared to follow through on high retail cost for it. Consequently, Mondelez should fix high retail costs for its excellent chocolate items and low for normal items to produce high income (Nieburg, 2017). The Treasury, Government of Australia tells than the nation has encountered economical salary development in the ongoing years and the rich have contributed huge to the expansion in national pay. The developing populace of the nation alongside the developing salary energize chocolate showcase (Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australian Government, 2017). Mondelez should advert ise its items more in the Australia and exploit the rising salary of the Australians to sell its items (Fletcher Guttmann, 2017). Mechanical: Innovation alludes to the degree of development and think-tanks complete to achieve new items and improve their current items. The limit of an organization to use innovation additionally decides its capacity to embrace manageable methods for creation and activity. Mondelez is a universal food maker who is monetarily exceptionally solid and can put resources into present day innovation. Australia is an innovatively solid nation and gives its organizations cutting edge innovation and extension for development. The consistently expanding request and changing utilization design supports modernisation and manageable creation. The food item makers like Mondelez have condition of craftsmanship innovation which encourages them to make reasonable items and packaging(Gold, Kunz Reiner, 2016). Mondelez has six current assembling plants in Australia which permits to organization to achieve creative results of prevalent quality (Lynch Jin, 2016). Culture of individuals has a significant task to carry out in the utilization design which further effects the interest of items. Religion, nationality, etc assume significant job in the way of life of individuals. Mondelez International makes chocolate items which are appreciated by individuals all things considered. The organization showcases its items universally to exploit this interest for chocolate across societies. The Australian individuals love chocolate items particularly premium chocolate items. Mondelez should fabricate and showcase premium chocolate items and take into account the Australian market (Tan et al., 2015). The individuals of Australia are expanding underscoring on supportable items and are prepared to pay for them. Mondelez should showcase practical chocolate items to take into account the Australian market (Wee et al., 2014). Macroenvironmental Factors Issue Opportunity or Threat recognizable proof Data Source Political/Legal Free market and lower tariif strategies Opportunity aph.gov.au, 2017 Financial Falling Australian Dollar Opportunity Beattie, 2017 Social Risisng interest for premium chocolate Opportunity Nieburg, 2017 Mechanical New assembling plants and cutting edge innovation Opportunity Lynch Jin, 2016) Culture Love for premium chocolate items among the Australians Opportunity Tan et al., 2015 The chart shows that Cadbury by Mondelez drives the chocolate market of Australia with its two direct rivals Kit Kat by Nestle having 17% offer and Mars at 9%. Their quality lies in their capacity to provide food the requirements of both the premium and low variation buyers. The two measurements which customers consider while making buy are assortment and accessible. The shortcoming of the contenders is their powerlessness to create an assortment of chocolate items which Mondelez can deliver. The perceptual guide beneath show the contenders of Mondelez International, the Y pivot shows wide decision and the X hub shows assortment. The figure shows that Mondelez International positions most noteworthy in the purchasers minds as per the two parameters. Assessment of the Companys Internal Capabilities and Core Competencies: Mondelez International is a worldwide organization taking into account worldwide buyer base. The organization is available in over a hundred nations which gives it an enormous upper hand. Product offering comprises of an assortment of premium items. The organization fabricates Cadbury which comes in both premium variations like Bournville and low valued variations. The organization additionally possesses Vegemite, Ritz, Belvita and different brands worth billions. The organization is monetarily solid with a net income $26 billion of every 2016. The organization has acquisitions like Cadbury worth billions of dollars which has given the organization its creative product offering. The product offering encourages the organization to frame a solid showcasing methodology. The organization follows vital human asset the executives in all the area it works in. The organization is a universal manager and utilizes individuals everywhere throughout the world. Mondelez International Australia utilizes in excess of 2000 workers who characteristic tit with itstalent and upper hand. Goes under reactions because of fatty and sugar content in the items which influences the advertising procedures of the organization. Product offering constrained to food items. Openings: Grow product offering towards different items like home consideration, electronic, etc. Present low calorie items like Coca Cola. Go into natural item advertise by new natural chocolate items. Enter new markets Faces hardened rivalry from substitutes like espresso. Fcaes hardened rivalry from other worldwide organizations like Nestle and Unilever. Faces danger from new participants in the entirety of its business sectors like nearby chocolate organizations. Ends: The investigation shows that Mondelez International Australia and New Zealand is a major worldwide organizations which experiences different macroeconomic variables like political, affordable, etc. The organization is monetarily solid and has a solid product offering. The results of the organization rule the market however face solid rivalry from other global food producers like Nestle. The accompanying proposals can be made for the companys future: Mondelez ought to grow its item portfolio so as to acquire c

An Examination of Alcohol and Narcotic Use in Anna Karenina - Literature Essay Samples

In a polemic against the use of alcohol and narcotics, Lev Tolstoy poses and then answers the question of why men stupefy themselves. He attacks these vices as escapes used to silence the human conscience and allow one to do that which moral convictions would otherwise prevent. Anna Karenina, written thirteen years earlier, provides a multitude of examples of the behavior of stupefaction which Tolstoy analyzes, but two characters rise above the rest in terms of comparison to Tolstoy’s writing on drugs and alcohol. The text explains in depth the mindset of the Oblonsky siblings which is presented in every instance of their substance use and abuse throughout the novel. Tolstoy presents the idea that each person has two inner beings, the blind and physical being which carries out all actions â€Å"like a wound-up machine,† and the seeing, spiritual being which judges the behavior of the physical, acting as a conscience which either lines up with those actions or points away from them depending on their morality. He argues that the use of alcohol and narcotics has deeper roots than the answers which people often give, such as that use improves their mood or passes the time, or just that everyone does it, because if it were that simple, these people would not willingly choose stupefying things over the wellbeing of their families. The real reason, Tolstoy says, is that when one feels the misalignment of the physical and spiritual parts of himself, he can either adjust his actions to realign with his conscience or obliterate his conscience so that he no longer feels the discrepancy; these two activities make up life. From the first page of the novel, Stepan Arkadyich Oblonsky fully embodies the habits of which Tolstoy so strongly disapproves. Every time Stiva is shown eating, he also drinks, and when he is outside, he smokes, often encouraging the participation of his companions. Stiva also willfully partakes in the widest variety of immoral behavior of all the major characters, and his inner dialogue presents the same mindset which Tolstoy argues drives those who â€Å"stupefy themselves.† The book opens with a scene in which he wakes up on the sofa after his wife finds out about his affair with the governess and recalls his dream, which involved â€Å"little carafes, which were also women.† This introduction sets the tone for Stiva’s behavior throughout the novel and introduces two of his vices: alcohol and women, as well as his unrepentant attitude towards them. His tobacco use first appears shortly after, in the third chapter of Part One, when he fills his pockets with va rious items including cigarettes. The first mention of Stiva’s alcohol consumption explains that he drinks champagne with all of his acquaintances, and Stiva has a great number of acquaintances, meaning that drinking is a habit in which he engages regardless of his companions. During his dinner with Levin, Stiva orders champagne and table wine, and the reader gets her first glimpse into the reasons for his drinking. He begins drinking when he and Levin discuss the differences between their lifestyles and relationships with women. Stiva sees the look of love in Levin’s eyes, and says something which prompts Levin to ask about Stiva’s own matters of love, but Stiva refuses to talk about himself, and shifts the conversation to Levin before slowly drinking his glass of wine. When conversation at last turns to Stiva’s affairs, he takes out a cigar and, â€Å"keeping one hand on his glass,† asks Levin for advice, smoking and drinking in order to get through a conversation with the morally upright Levin about the marital failure for which he feels bad, but for Dolly’s feelings rather than his own behavior Stiva’s conscience becomes louder in the presence of Levin and his morally pure views about relationships, forcing him to reflect on his recent betrayal of his wife, a problem which he solves with an extra high dosage of his usual poisons. When Stiva approaches Karenin in an attempt to reconcile the man to his wife’s infidelity and grant her a divorce, he acutely feels the wrongness of what he plans to do and pulls out a cigarette so that he can overcome this and do it anyway. Stiva’s conscience makes itself known in the form of embarrassment, which he is not used to and therefore does not recognize it for what it is, mistaking it for timidity. Stiva wishes to use the same tactic, although cannot, when he approaches Karenin again in Part Seven to inquire about the elusive divorce. Upon arriving at Lydia Ivanovna’s house to get a concrete answer for Anna, Stiva encounters opposition to any conversation involving Karenin’s marital circumstances and is then forced into a discussion about religion which confuses and upsets him, and with muddled thoughts he thinks about how nice it would be to smoke (which he cannot do in his current company). Once again, Stiva knows that he should not be there a sking for mercy on behalf of his sister but is so dedicated to her that he attributes his uneasy feeling to something else, the conversation and the presence of the psychic, instead of listening to his conscience and leaving Karenin to do as he sees fit as the injured party. Stiva also drinks to keep himself from judging the behavior of his friends which indirectly reflects his own behavior. When Stiva visits Levin and Kitty with his friend Vasenka, he sees the blatant courting of his sister-in-law, but refuses to acknowledge that it is disrespectful or wrong, because he too instigates relationships with women which he should not. He drinks several glasses of wine at dinner in order to stifle questions of morality which may arise due to the behavior of his friend and the presence of his wife, two people who would generally bring out different and contrary behavior in him. Stiva’s suppression of his conscience is so constant that on the first day of the hunt, he comes out of t he house ready to leave and already has a cigar in his mouth, stupefaction most likely required due to the combination of his friend’s brazen behavior and the fact that he barely saw the wife from whom he had been parted for the majority of the summer before going off to hunt. During the first night of the hunt, Stiva discusses the necessity of masculine independence with Levin, who was concerned about leaving Kitty (who is pregnant) for two days, and asserts that there is nothing wrong with courting farm girls, because he has fun and his wife will be â€Å"none the worse for it† as long as nothing like that happens in the home. Levin ends the discussion and Stiva lights a cigar and leaves the barn to obliterate the conscience which would otherwise be screaming at the hypocrisy of a man in an unhappy marriage who cheated on his pregnant wife with his children’s governess giving relationship advice to a morally superior man. Stiva often assumes that his companions will consume in the same way that he does and encourages them to keep up. He does this intentionally according to Tolstoy, to stupefy those around him and numb their consciences which would otherwise object to his behavior. He automatically fills Levin’s glass before their conversation about Stiva’s affair, although Levin refuses what would be his third glass of wine at lunch and proceeds to give him an objective and judgmental metaphor about stealing sweet rolls on a full stomach. The first time that Stiva and Levin go hunting, Stiva expresses surprise that Levin does not smoke, saying that it is â€Å"not so much a pleasure as the crown and hallmark of pleasure,† unable to comprehend that Levin does not have the same need to hide his behavior from the spiritual and moral part of him. While the Levins reside in Moscow awaiting Kitty’s delivery, Stiva takes advantage of Levin’s susceptibility to peer pressure and, after they have both drunk a great deal, convinces him to see Anna, something with which Stiva knows that neither Levin nor Kitty is comfortable based on their behavior when the topic came up on his visit to their home with Vasenka. Additionally, Stiva knows that it is wrong to stupefy himself in this way, but if the people around him are doing the same, then he has the excuse that everyone drinks, and everyone smokes, and does not have to think about the true cause of his urges. The only mention of Anna Arkadyevna Karenina being under the influence before she gives birth comes during the ball scene when Kitty notices that Anna is â€Å"drunk with the wine of the rapture she inspired,† perhaps an indicator of the addiction to which her relationship with Vronsky will lead.[5]Anna’s substance use begins after the birth of her illegitimate daughter, when she believes that she will die and wishes to stop the pain. The moment at which she demands morphine also comes directly after the scene in which she unites her husband and Vronsky, an emotionally distressing situation which forces her to confront the fact that she just gave birth to a child who is not her husband’s, and that she never seriously considered ending the affair despite her knowledge of the immorality and negative effects on her husband and son. The morphine dampens the pain of her fever, but it has side effects include sedation and euphoria, both of which would give Anna an esca pe from her complicated personal life and make addiction to the already habit-forming opioid even easier. Later in the novel, the reader finds out that Anna does become addicted to morphine, and consistently uses it to rid herself of paranoia about Vronsky and thoughts of her husband and son or her complicated position in society. When Dolly visits the Vronsky estate and talks to Anna about arranging a divorce since Karenin has finally consented, Anna retorts that she cannot talk about the matter because it drives her mad and when she thinks about it, she cannot fall asleep without morphine. She cannot bear to think of the husband she wronged and the son who she will lose forever in the case of a divorce; as much as she wants to be rid of Karenin, their marriage, however meaningless, connects her to Seryozha. Her attachment to her husband brings Anna pain, but thinking about a divorce and the permanent loss of her son drudges up her own immoral actions which put her in that situation, and she cannot accept this awareness of the spiritual part of her which disapproves of her actions. Ther e is also lingering guilt about her romance with a Vronsky and how it began at a time when he had led Kitty to believe that he would propose. Anna reveals this guilt when she asks whether Kitty is still angry with her, before continuing to deny responsibility for the situation, saying that it could not have been otherwise. This suggests that she still has not accepted her choice in the matter and her complicity in the destruction of lives around her, numbing herself with morphine instead of facing herself. Anna distracts herself during the day with external diversions which Tolstoy claims that â€Å"for people of dull, limited moral feeling [†¦] are often quite sufficient to enable them not to perceive the indications conscience gives of the wrongness of their lives.† She reads voraciously, walks, and talks with Princess Varvara, but Anna is the kind of person for whom external means are not sufficient, and for this reason she turns to morphine at night, stopping her brain for a moment of peace from the anxiety that whispers thoughts of Vronsky’s indifference and imagined infidelity. By Part Seven of the novel, Anna is so desperate to stupefy herself that she no longer limits her substance use to morphine at night. During Levin’s visit, Anna reveals that she has begun using tobacco as well when she asks Levin if he smokes and then takes out a cigarette for herself. Due to Anna’s social ostracization, she does not have a wealth of opportunities for distr action; she begins supporting an English family and writing a children’s book, and never stops reading, but those do not take up enough hours in the day. As her panic about her situation increases, so does her need to escape, eventually leading her to take more than one dose of opium at night, and to wonder if drinking the whole bottle of it would kill her, though she ultimately chooses a less peaceful end. Tolstoy’s â€Å"Why Do Men Stupefy Themselves?† explains more fully the beliefs about alcohol and narcotics which he expresses through their role in Anna Karenina. Stepan Arkadyich constantly battles the spiritual side of himself which would prevent him from having affairs and enabling his sister and force him to examine the morality of his behavior, a task which he attacks with copious consumption of alcohol and tobacco. Anna Arkadyevna shows the addictive and stupefying nature of narcotics when she forms an opium habit after the birth of her illegitimate child, attempting to suppress thoughts of the morality of past actions rather than preparing herself to commit more. The two siblings present different images of stupefaction, one numb enough to continue life as he wishes, and the other never fully escaping her conscience by those means, but they both demonstrate the duality of the inner being, the physical and the spiritual as Tolstoy classifies them.

Engel V. Vitale the Beginning of the Battle Against...

â€Å" One of the most highly debated aspects of American life and liberty is religion. America’s foundation is based upon the idea that religion should be a freedom and a choice of the person involved, not a requirement by the government. Yet religion is one of the very things to United States was founded on. In the last half of the 20th century, the differing opinions Americans held on religious conviction became an ongoing debate on where and when is the right time to observe one’s faith. Most notably this debate extended to the public schools. One of the most prominent cases was that of Engel v. Vitale. The court case of Engel v. Vitale became known as the School Prayer decision and was the first of its kind in the American judicial†¦show more content†¦Mr. Justice Stewart stated in his dissent â€Å"I cannot see how an â€Å"official religion† is established by letting those who want say a prayer say it† (Constitutional Conflicts). While I, personally, agree with Justice Stewart, the true facts of the Establishment Cause contradict the idea that the formation of an â€Å"official religion† was not present in the Regent’s prayer. Lynda Beck Fenwick, in her book Should the Children Pray? : A Historical, Judicial, and Political Examination of Public School Prayer, asserts that â€Å"something less than an actual establishment may nevertheless be found to respect an establishment, and as a result is prohibited† (124-125). In conclusion, I believe that the decision made in the Supreme Court case of Engel v. Vitale was correct. Although this case was the springboard for many of the more radical ideas of the likes of Madlyn Murray O’Hare, this case did uphold the ideas and beliefs of America’s Founding Fathers. Many have made the dispute over school prayer out to be a point of division in our nation. Yet the majority believes religion should be a part of our school systems. According to an article by John C. Green and James L. Guth, a â€Å"1983 Gallup poll found 81% of the â€Å"aware† public favoring aShow MoreRelatedSepartion of Church and State Essay1246 Words   |  5 Pagesthought and freedom. The Establishment Clause was one way that civilians were protecting religious liberty by the separation of church and state. Within our political and school systems there have been a number of controversial issues to include religious holidays, school prayer, teaching evolution and aid to church based schools. The Supreme Court has ruled in many cases in regards to these religious controversial issues. The First Amendment states â€Å"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishmentRead MoreSame-Sex Marriage and Religion: An Inappropriate Relationship8330 Words   |  34 Pagesdifferent groups of people. Those who engage in the debate believe strongly in their convictions; the two loudest voices tend to come from the gay community and the religious community, the former arguing in favor of same-sex marriage and the latter against it. Religious groups, predominantly from a Christian based faith, seem to be the single most influential force in the attempts to keep same-sex marriage illegal. Proposition 8 passed by a vote of 52% to 48%; according to one exit poll 81% of self-identified

Aristotle s Portrayal Of Friendship - 1708 Words

You have two close friends, while one is alive the other dead, but your relationship with both of them work to develop your virtuous character. While in Nicomachean Ethics Aristotle s depiction of friendship is a lively one, they show affection and their own virtuous character translates to our own. In contrast, Seneca s On The Shortness Of Life suggests that we should seek friends of virtue with the dead because they possess the ability to always be with us and guide us with their own knowledge of life. While Aristotle and Seneca would rather choose one form of friendship over the other, we can denounce the notion that we must pick one of these two friends when we can have both because these two types of relationships work together to†¦show more content†¦Ã¢â‚¬Å"But friendship seems to consist more in giving than in receiving affection† (213). Friendship in itself is virtuous and when you obtain a true friend not only is establishing the relationship itself seeking vi rtue but obtaining it as well. This is made evident when Aristotle tells us this, â€Å". . .friendship; for it is a kind of virtue, or implies virtue, and it is also necessary for living† (200). However, for a true friendship to be good, the two bodies of the friendship must be good individually in order to obtain virtue through the relationship. â€Å"Only the friendship of those who are good, and similar in their goodness, is perfect. For these people, each alike wish good for the other qua good. . .† (205). Good people are friends because they are both good and seek out goodness in their own lives and do this through their friends. â€Å"The good are friends for each other’s sake because their bond is goodness† (208). By befriending good people, you are able to absorb the other person s goodness, which in turn leads to your own virtue and your virtue only adds to the other s. â€Å"For when a good man becomes a friend to another he becomes that other ’s good; so each loves his own good, and repays what he receives by wishing the good of the other†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (209). Another interesting point that Aristotle discusses is this notion that we see ourselves in our friends and this not only leads us to themShow MoreRelatedIndian English Novel17483 Words   |  70 Pagescontemporary touch with the coming of Mulk Raj Anand, Raja Rao and R.K.Narayan. The social disparity of India which was aptly described by Mulk Raj Anand in his Coolie, the imaginary village life with its entire unedited realities in R.K. Narayan`s Malgudi Days and last but not the least the aura of Gandhism depicted by Raja Rao in his remarkable novel Kanthapura portrayed a whole new India. The need of the `foreigners` depicting India amidst their write ups was not needed as Indians wantedRead Morewisdom,humor and faith19596 Words   |  79 Pages there is â€Å"a time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance.† Enlightening comments on the relationship of humor to wisdom were once made by Reinhold Niebuhr (1892-1971), perhaps the twentieth-century’s most influential U. S. theologian (and a favorite thinker of President Obama). Although Niebuhr generally agreed that humor stresses the incongruous, he also, like Chesterton and Solomon, linked it with humility. Humor is a proof of the capacity of the self to gain a vantageRead MoreAlcohol Marketing and Advertising25059 Words   |  101 Pagesthe desired taste and alcohol level. FMBs are marketed in traditional beer bottles, and have an alcohol content of 4% to 6% by volume, similar to other beers. Marketers introduced citrus-flavored FMBs, including â€Å"hard† lemonades in the late 1990 s.10 More recently, brewers have entered into agreements with distillers to introduce spirits-branded FMBs that typically taste like a combination of light beer and citrus or other fruit.11 Other FMBs have flavors similar to wine coolers or cocktails

Blood And Water Essay Example For Students

Blood And Water Essay Blood and WaterIn William Shakespeares masterpiece Macbeth, he uses many motifs. Two of these motifs are blood and water. The play is full of images of blood and water, to show the characters attitudes toward their own guilt at each stage. Both motifs mature and change in their meaning along with the setting and mood of the play. The functions of both are important if the subtleties of the play are to be understood. Blood symbolizes honor, treachery, and guilt. Water symbolizes cleanliness of the soul, as though all it takes is water to wash guilt away. While reading the play, it is noticed that blood comes up repeatedly. This is important to the overall effect of the different usages in the play. The word blood, or different forms of it, is found forty-two times in the play, along with several other passages dealing with the symbol. The symbolism of blood strangely follows the change in the character Macbeth. Macbeth is first a soldier, very highly revered by the King Duncan. As the play progresses, Macbeths demeanor and personality declines, as does the meaning of blood. Blood is then viewed as a symbol for treachery and bloodshed, along with the various forms of guilt. The first reference of blood is one of honor, and occurs when Duncan sees the injured captain and says What bloody man is that?(I, 2, ln.1).This mention of blood is symbolic of honor, for the brave fighter has been injured in a glorious and ardent battle for his country.In the next passage the captain says that Macbeths sword . . .smoked with bloody execution(I, 1, ln.20), with this he is referring to Macbeths braveness in which his sword is steaming because it is covered in the hot blood!of the enemy on the cold morning of the battle. This function is important because it shows that at this point in the play the word blood is used as a sign of fighting valiantly. It is a sort of pride to have a bloodied sword, or have bled in battle for your king. After blood has been referred to a few times with reference to honor, the symbol of blood now changes to show a theme of treachery and treason.Lady Macbeth begins the change when she asks the spirits to make thick my blood, (1,5, ln.50). What Lady Macbeth is saying is that she wishes to be remorseless and insensitive about the murders sheand Macbeth will soon commit. Also in this area the symbol of blood is changes to one of guilt. Lady Macbeth knows that the evidence of blood is a treacherous symbol, and knows that if they are found with bloody daggers they will be hanged for their betrayal of the king, so she tells Macbeth to smear the sleepy grooms with blood.(II, 2, ln.64), and Macbeth replies If he do bleed, Ill gild the faces of the grooms withal /for it must seem their guilt.(II, 2, ln.72-3). When Banquo states and question this most bloody piece of work,(II, 3, ln.150)and Ross says ist known who did this more than bloody deed?(II, 4, ln.31), they a!re both inquiring as to who m performed the treacherous acts upon Duncan. Once again, blood is used as a sign of guilt. Both use blood as a mark upon a person which would point them out as a sure suspect for the killing of Duncan. Whoever has the blood of Duncan on them is guilty of treason, and more importantly, they are guilty of the murder. It is also here where the theme of water is first brought in. Macbeth is fretting about the fact that it was he who killed the king, and he was beginning to regret the choice he made, saying Will all great Neptunes ocean wash this blood /clean from my hand?(II, 2, ln.78) Lady Macbeth, still sure that they will never be caught, says A little water clears us of this deed.(II, 2, ln.86) This shows that the function of water is to be used as a symbol for an element which can absolve a person of all guilt. This is important because it seems to be the counter, or the antithesis of blood, where one is a sign of guilt, and ..the other is an absolution of it. The third, and perhaps the most often use of the symbol blood, is of the theme of guilt.This was hinted upon earlier when Lady Macbeth mad sure that no blood was found on either her or Macbeth. Macbeth firsts hints at his guilt when he says Will all great Neptunes ocean wash this blood clean from my hand?, meaning that he wondered if he would ever be able to forget the dastardly deed that he had committed.Then the ghost of Banquo, all gory and bloody, comes to haunt Macbeth at the banquet.The sight of apparitions represents Macbeths guilt for the murder of Banquo which he planned.Macbeth shows a bit of his guilt when he says It is the bloody business which informs thus, he could not get the courage to say murder after he had killed Duncan, so he says this instead. The function of blood as guilt is very important because it is what eventually brings the downfall of Macbeth and drives Lady Macbeth to suicide. .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97 , .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97 .postImageUrl , .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97 , .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97:hover , .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97:visited , .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97:active { border:0!important; } .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97:active , .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97 .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ud4a9301b98fca75cf4a9d1d94e4abb97:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: My Granny EssayWater also makes another appearance, again relating to cleanliness and the washing away of something. The forces of Macduff talk of this when thy say . . . pour we in our countrys purge /Each drop of us. /Or so much as it needs /To dew our sovergn flower and drown the weeds. (V, 2, ln.33-6) Here the theme of water takes along with the theme of cleanliness, also a them of a strengthening agent. They talk of how water composed of a little of each of them would dew the sovergn flower, Macduff, and drown the weeds, Macbeth. Lady Macbeth shows the most outright and blatant example of guilt using the symbol of blood in the scene in which she walks in her sleep. Sh e says Out damned spot, out, I say!One. Two. /Why then, tis time to dot. Hell is murky. Fie, my /lord, fie, a soldier, and afeard?What need we fear /who knows it, when none can call out power to /account?Yet who would have thought the old man /to have had so much blood in him?(V, 1, ln.37-42)This speech represents the fact that she cannot wipe the blood stains of Duncan off of her hands. This isironic that she says this, because of the comment she made right after the murder, when Macbeth was feeling guilty, she said A little water clears us of this deed.(II, 2, ln.86)Obviously, she now feels differently, even if this is only shown through her subconscious. This last is shown just before the ending of the play, when Macbeth has Macduff at his mercy, and lets him go, because of his guilt.He shows that he is guilty, when he says But get thee back, my soul is too much charged /With blood of thine already.(V, 8, ln.6-7)Macduff replies, I have no words; /My voice is in my sword, thou bloodier villain /Than terms can give thee out.(V, 8, ln.8-10) In Macduffs last remark we see that he believes Macbeth to have committed a crime that is so horrible that there are no words for it, and Macduff therefore calls him a Bloody villain, again showing that blood is used as a sign of treachery, or loathing. After Macduff manages to kill Macbeth, the symbolic theme of blood swings back to what it was at the beginning of the play.It is the symbol of honor to Malcolm this time. The death of Macbeth is an honored feat that Macduff is congratulated for. It can also be speculated that maybe the cycle will continue around again, with Mal!com obtaining the same demeanor and ambitions as Macbeth did, and have his character go through the same changes. We have seen meaning of the symbol of blood change from honor to treachery, to guilt, and then we have seen it revert back to the meaning of honor once again after the villain that changed the meaning from honor to tyranny is killed. Water is present throughout the play, and is used as a cure for guilt, a strengthening agent, and means to wipe out a common enemy . Both of these symbols were present throughout the play, and showed how many of the characters felt a certain times during the play.